Take Up the Cross and Follow Him

Matthew 16:24-25 New King James Version (NKJV)

24 Then Jesus said to His disciples, “If anyone desires to come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow Me.
25 For whoever desires to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.



Sunday, September 8, 2013

Stand To for 9 September, 2013



Push Back with Prayer

0700 at BJ’s Restaurant

Hamilton, Montana

 

1. Opening - Round the Table Individual Prayers

2. Morning Psalm: 130

3. Breakfast Reading: Acts 10:34-43

4. Breakfast is served

5. Breakfast Discussion Topic: Guest Speaker

6. Closing - Round the Table Individual Prayers

Sermon - Fasting - 1812

This sermon was preached by Henry Colman in Massachusetts on the day of the national fast: August 20, 1812. This national fast day was proclaimed by President James Madison in response to the war with England – the War of 1812. The transcript of the sermon has been updated to reflect modern spelling and grammar.








A

SERMON.

Preached in Higham and Quincy,

20th, August 1812,

the Day of

THE NATIONAL FAST,

on account of

THE WAR WITH GREAT BRITAIN.

By Henry Colman, Minister of the Third Church in Hingham.

The
DIVINE PROVIDENCE;

ROMANS, viii. 28.
WE KNOW THAT ALL THINGS WORK TOGETHER FOR GOOD TO THEM THAT LOVE GOD.


I think, my brethren, I may venture to assert that a more interesting passage than the text cannot be found in the whole compass of the Scriptures. The inferences to be made from it are clear, satisfactory, and delightful. It teaches us that every object and event is under the particular providence of God; that whatever happens will be subservient to a wise and benevolent purpose; and that, in every change of circumstance, the good man will be safe and happy.

These truths are highly practical. I doubt not, my brethren, that many of you feel and daily act under their influence. Infinitely happy would it be if this were the case with all of us. These truths are exceedingly useful in seasons of difficulty, distress, and trial. I know now, therefore, how I can better discharge the duty which, on this occasion, devolves upon me than my making them the subject of your reflections. They are indeed among the most familiar truths of religion: and this is one of the distinguishing blessings of revelation, that it has diffused the knowledge of them among every class in society; so that the humble and illiterate Christian knows more of the Divine character and providence, and possesses far higher principles of conduct than the heathen philosopher. But, however familiar they may be by serious and virtuous minds, they will ever be contemplated with fresh interest; and they cannot be too frequently contemplated to yield that peace to our hears which they are capable of affording and that direction to our conduct to which they are entitled by their importance.

I. We infer from the text the universal providence of God. This is one of the plainest truths of natural religion; and it is inscribed in the brightest characters on the page of divine revelation. I will suggest a few of the arguments upon which the belief of this doctrine is grounded, with a view of furnishing topics for your private meditation rather than of entering upon the discussion of so comprehensive a subject.

1. The least reflection must convince us that this earth and the celestial system moved around us, whose appearances and revolutions we have reduced to minute calculation, are not the production of what we call chance or accident; or what the ancients denominated fate. From the nature of matter we know that it could not have produced itself; from many facts and observations we learn that it has not existed forever. It must therefore have had a creator. We have only then, in the next place, to think a moment of the extent and construction of the universe, as far as it appears to our naked observation, much more as viewed with the eye of philosophy, to be satisfied that the Creator is possessed of wisdom and power greater than we can possibly conceive and to us, consequently, in every respect infinite.

From a similar survey of the works of nature we may deduce an inference in favor of the goodness of the Creator. The world in which we live is certainly not the production of a malevolent being; for, as we have seen, the power of the Creator was adequate to any effect; misery, in such case, would have undeniable predominated over the earth. There would have been neither fragrance nor harmony nor beauty in nature. Every sky had been dark; every field had been barren; the ocean had exhibited nothing but the fury and horrors of the storm; the wind had borne nothing but disease and death in its course; every exertion of the intellect had been agony; every sense had but a channel of torture to the mind; above all, the bow of the divine mercy had never been seen in the heavens and religion had never shed its peace and its hope upon the soul.

But the most that has been done, even by those persons who think the worst of the world, is not to prove, hardly to assert, that there is an excess of misery; but only to question whether happiness actually predominate in the earth. With me, however, there is not, with no one, should I think, there could be a question on this subject. When I consider the few instances of sickness, deformity, and misery, which appear in the world compared with those of health, soundness, and enjoyment and the compensation which is provided in many of these cases; when I consider the innumerable sources of felicity with which man is furnished, his sensual, intellectual, moral, and religious capacities; when I consider the myriads, in number and variety of living existences which the people the earth, the air, the sea; which inhabit every particle of our blood, which feast on every leaf, which riot on every breeze; all, as far as we can learn from observation and analogy, possessing the capacity and the means of happiness, full of pleasure as they are full of activity; I cannot for a moment doubt that felicity predominates in nature; and I cannot but acknowledge the unutterable and unbounded goodness of the Deity.

We have then, my brethren, discovered an author of nature who is finitely powerful, wise, and good. We have learnt that this world is the production of his power, wisdom, and benevolence; and consequently, we must believe that His designs in the creation were worthy of His sublime and venerable attributes. Can we then suppose that he has relinquished all concern for the work of His hands? – that He remains an indifferent spectator of its condition and progress? Such inferences would be irrational and impious. We must then conclude that the world ever has been, that it still is, and that it ever will remain, an object of His affectionate care.

2. Another argument for the Providence of God, equally conclusive with that which has been offered, may be drawn from the moral character of the Deity. From the moral powers of man we infer the moral character of the Creator. He that planted the ear, shall He not hear? He that formed the eye, shall He not see? 1 The clear and immutable distinction between truth and falsehood, the faculty of conscience, the unalienable and great rewards of virtue and the same, ruin, and the miseries of vice which are almost invariable consequent upon the practice of the one and the other, ever in the present life, are circumstances which, together with many others, show that man is under a moral government; and, taken in connection with the probably presumption of a future state from the light of nature, hardly afford room for doubt that, under this constitution, virtue will terminate in the happiness and vice in the degradation and misery of such as practice it. But every notion of the moral government of God implies His constant superintendence; implies that He is ever present to observe the characters and actions of men; to adjust the circumstances of their condition; to secure to those who perform His will the rewards which, under such a government, were to be expected; and to bring upon the wicked those evils which they have deserved and the infliction of which, the purpose of such a government seems indispensably to demand.

Many other arguments might be adduced but I think that these two, drawn form the nature and moral attributes of the Deity, as they are discoverable by the light of nature, are sufficient to show that the doctrine of a Divine Providence is reasonable and entitled to our belief. “Nothing,” says his biographer, “seemed to Sir Isaac Newton, the prince of philosophers, more unaccountable than to exclude the Deity only out of the universe.” “The philosopher,” says the same writer, “who overlooks the traces of an all-governing Deity in nature, contenting himself with the appearances of the material universe only and the mechanical laws of motion, neglects what is most excellent and prefers what is imperfect to what is supremely perfect, finitude to infinity, what is narrow and weak to what is unlimited and almighty, and what is perishing to what endures forever.” 2

3. But in whatever difficulties or obscurity to the natural philosopher the doctrine of a particular providence may seem involved; to the Christian philosopher there is no deficiency of light and no room for doubt. To him the very fact of a revolution is sufficient proof of it; still more the successive interpositions of Heaven in the concerns of mankind, of which the Scriptures exhibit an affecting account. To his view are unfolded the different steps in a most interesting and intimate intercourse between God and man. To him, God is represented as to over all, in all, and through all things. 3 No part of creation is uninhabited by His presence; no event is concealed form His knowledge; no object is remote from His care. The minute and the vast, the weak and powerful, the peasant and the monarch, the infant and philosopher, the little insect of the day sporting on the summer’s sun beam and the seraph who wings his way through an enteral year in the effulgence of God’s presence, every earthly and every celestial existence are equally the productions of His power and the objects of His constant and paternal care. The thunder is His voice, the winds His chariot, and the terrific lightning but the “shining of his glittering spear.” 4 He is present as much in the fall of a sparrow as in the destruction of an empire, in the rolling of a pebble as in the revolutions of a planet. As in the army of Heaven so He rules among the inhabitants of the earth; 5 as in the natural so in the moral world are His presence and providence felt. Every nation, every family, every individual is the object of his attention. Moral beings must be so in a peculiar sense, for vice is His abhorrence and virtue is His delight. The circumstances then of our situation and the moral influences to which we are exposed, are ever observed by Him; the trials, the changes, the blessings and the calamities which befall us, befall us by His permission and are ever under His direction. Such appear to be the explicit representations of the Scriptures. They are interesting and, like everything which relates to the Deity, they are vast and sublime. I do not cite the numerous passages which express them because I am persuaded they are familiar to your minds. Such then is the great Being under whose government we live; under whose superintendency all things on earth, in Heaven, and throughout the universe, proceed.

II. That we are not able to comprehend the manner in which this providence is exercised, cannot be an objection to the reception of a doctrine so plainly revealed and which, from its very nature, must be infinitely beyond the grasp of the human understanding. Things are great or small by comparison. When we consider the arts, inventions, and acquisitions which are in possession of the human mind, we dwell with fond admiration upon the extent of our powers; but when, on the other hand, we reflect how little we know in comparison of what is to be known, we shall see sufficient reason to be humble and perceive that the wisdom of man is folly in the sight of God. 6 When we attempt to penetrate the secrets of matter, or the complex operations of intellect, we are baffled at every step by the imbecility and deficiency of our powers. It is utterly beyond our capacity to comprehend the manner in which an ear of corn, a blade of grass, or a leaf is produced; in which the growth of any part of our bodies is carried on; to understand the production and arrangement of our thoughts; the mysterious connection of spirit and matter; or that invisible energy by which the motions of the body are excited and controlled at the pleasure of the mind. How much less are we able to comprehend that all-prevailing spirit, which first gave form to matter and intelligence and activity to mind; which established and controls the laws and operations of universal nature. But, in whatever obscurity the manner in which a divine providence is carried on, may be involved, yet the doctrine is sufficiently explained for every practical purpose; - first, to guard us against an abuse to which it is otherwise liable; secondly, to give all that assistance and encouragement to the practice of virtue which it is capable of yielding.

1. The abuse to which this doctrine is liable and that, from which it has actually suffered, is that we should suppose that it deprives us of our moral agency; that, under such a providence we are no longer free, consequently are no longer accountable and therefore, that there is neither vice nor virtue in the world, men become mere machines and morality is not predicable of any of their actions. But we have a sufficient security against so hurtful an inference.

It is not indeed possible for us, with the foreknowledge of God, which His providence implies, to reconcile the freedom of man or the contingency of human actions. This is a problem too difficult for us to solve. The authority of the great Locke should in this case be considered as decisive. “I freely own,” says hi, “the weakness of my understanding; that though it be unquestionable that there is omnipotence and omniscience in God our Maker, and I cannot have a clearer perception of any thing than that I am free; yet I cannot make freedom in man consistent with omnipotence and omniscience in God, though I am as fully persuaded of both as of any truths I most firmly assent to. And therefore I have long since given off the consideration of that question, resolving all into this short conclusion, that if it be possible for God to make a free agent then men is free, though I see not the way of it.” 7 But it is sufficient for us to know that the doctrine of the foreknowledge and providence of God and of freedom in man stand upon the same authority; that they are both explicitly taught and recognized in the Scriptures; are consequently both to be received; and we are no more at liberty to give up the one than the other. It is sufficient for us to be conscious that we are free; to be unable, whatever we think of ourselves, to regard the conduct of others as wholly unsusceptible of praise or blame; that we are not willing, when they have injured us, to take necessity as a satisfactory apology for their behavior: - but, above all, it is sufficient for us to reflect that those dispensations of providence whose history is taught us, are all addressed to us as free beings; and that throughout the Scriptures we are instructed, urged, entreated, and threatened in regard to our duty which would be nothing short of insult and mockery to those who were altogether necessary and involuntary agents. Particular and intimate then as the providence of God over the world may be, it must be perfectly compatible with the moral freedom of man. God is not, therefore, the author sin: men are accountable for every sentiment which they nourish and every action which they perform and shall be rewarded according to the deeds done in the body, whether they be good or evil.

2. In the next place, the doctrine of a divine providence, though it be not free form difficulties, is yet sufficiently explained to afford every possible motive and aid to the practice of virtue.

Under such a providence we cannot account for the existence or the permission of moral evil, which scatters desolation and wretchedness among the family of God; but, under such a providence, we cannot doubt of the final security, felicity, and triumphs of virtue. The doctrine of the text is entirely satisfactory on this momentous subject. “We know that all things work together for good to them that love God.” What else does this teach us, but that health and sickness, prosperity and adversity are the beneficent messengers of a gracious parent to his obedient children? What else does it teach us but that even the moral evils of which we complain, the folly, the corruption, and the vices of mankind from which arise so much misery and distress in the earth, will, under the perfect government of the Deity, be rendered subservient to His benevolent purposes; and contribute with events of a different description to the improvement and felicity of His virtuous offspring? Through it be impossible for us to conceive how these effects may be produced yet we know that the wisdom of the Deity is adequate to contrive and His power to apply the mans of their accomplishment. He can bring light out of darkness and good out of evil. Surely the wrath of man shall praise him; 8 and, let it touch the pious heart with ecstasy, all things shall work together for good to them that love God.

Shall we then, my brethren, do evil that good may come? God forbid. Be not deceived; evil communications corrupt good principles. 9 We must all stand before the judgment seat of Christ to receive the just recompense of our conduct, 10 in that solemn hour when the heart and character shall be stripped of every disguise; when no pleas of repentance; not claim shall be allowed to the divine favor but the claim of virtue. The miseries and evils form which the wicked suffer in this life and which, through their neglect, contribute in no respect to their amendment or reformation, will only aggravate their guilt and increase the tribulation, the horror, and the anguish of their future destiny. But it is not so with the righteous for it shall be well with him. 11 Every evil and trial in which he is here involved is but a step in his progress towards Heaven and shall contribute to augment his future felicity. He who has God for his friend must be safe. He who has God for his friend must be happy.

III. Let us be persuaded then, my brethren, by everything that is dear and valuable in our existence, to flee form the wrath which hangs over the vicious and impenitent and seize, with trembling eagerness, the blessed assurance of Divine protection and favor which is held out to the righteous.

Our whole duty is comprehended in two directions; to forsake our sins and to practice virtue. Let us search and try our ways and turn unto the Lord. 12 Let this day which we devote to an awful and interesting service of religion, witness the ardor and sincerity of our repentance. We have come up hither to humble ourselves before God, because of the judgments with which He is pleased to visit us; let us truly repent of those sins which have contributed to bring them upon us. Let us rigidly examine and resolutely renounce the sins of our tempers, our heats, and our conduct. While we stand here praying before God, let us look forward to the hour when we shall stand in the immediate presence of our judge; when every guilty action or sentiment or though which is un-repented of, shall be exhibited to us and to the world in all its deformity and rend with agony the hardest heart. Let this day constitute a new era in our lives; ad ay from which we date the subjugation of our evil passion to the dominion of reason and religion, and the anxious consecration of ourselves to the service of our Maker. Let us, in a word, become good men and good Christians.

In these days of peculiar distress and trial our country and world, liberty, virtue, and religion have most powerful demands on us. Subduing therefore with anxious solicitude those lusts and passions from whence vice and misery spring, and rising superior to all sordid and base sentiments and to all the paltry interests of place or of party, let us consecrate with undeviating firmness and incessant activity, our time and talents to the prosperity and happiness of our country; constantly exerting ourselves to meet the crisis with the magnanimity which it demands; remembering the example and copying the sublime virtues of that galaxy of Christian patriots, whose names shall ever be music to the ear of the philanthropist; who led our country from oppression to independence and glory; who, amidst the tempest and uproar of war, stood unmoved with hearts fixed upon God; and, while darkness covered the political heavens and the thunders were bursting on every side, seized the vivid shafts, aimed at the liberties of their country and conducted them harmless to the ground.

But while we are not unmindful of the claims of our native country, let us not forget that paramount to all others are the claims of God upon our service. Much as we may love the land which gave us birth, yet patriotism is in some degree a selfish passion. Though born for our country, we must not forget that we were born likewise for the world; though designed to be the benefactors of our nation we were designed, likewise in a still higher sense, to be the servants of God. Nor are these interests incompatible with each other. They perfectly coalesce and he who is most devoted to God is the most the most effectual benefactor to mankind. Much then as we may desire the happiness and prosperity of our native land, let this desire and the efforts which spring from it be regulated by reason, justice, and piety.

Whatever accidental distinctions may take place among men, arising from situation, language, habits, or character they are equally our brethren, the children of the same parent, the heirs of the same immortality. Though in case of favor or aid, our efforts must have a definite object and a choice must be made of those to whom our influence may be most effectually extended, yet we cannot be justified for the slightest violation towards any of the great law of Christian equity and love. Let our conduct therefore be always governed by the laws of God. Let us not indeed expel from our hearts the tender and interesting sentiments of natural affection, friendships and patriotism; but let us cherish and increase them and let them animate and invigorate our exertions. At the same time, let them ever be subordinate to the great duty of general benevolence; and let us act with a supreme reference to the advancement of truth, righteousness, and peace, of rational liberty, of sound virtue, and of genuine religion.

Every individual, whatever be his situation in life, has talents which may contribute in some degree to these ends. Let him call them into exercise and let them be discreetly and constantly applied. Let a man first reform and improve himself; let him apply his efforts next to the reformation and virtue of his children, his family, and his neighborhood; let him encourage and strengthen the patriotic, benevolent, and pious efforts of others by every means in his power; and exerting himself thus, in the sphere in which his influence is felt, his labors will not be without success nor without reward.

Individual repentance, reformation, and virtue are thus necessary to constitute national repentance, reformation, and virtue. It is absurd to talk of the latter without the former. Let the former be effected and the latter will follow of course. This, under the blessing of a divine providence, will contribute to deliver us from the calamities and distresses which we suffer and to avert the still greater evils which threaten us. But, if we are not able to accomplish their removal, if we must drain this better cup, yet if we become good men and good Christians, we have nothing to fear; our record is on high and our interests are safe. Virtue will give a new complexion to the dark scenes of human life; it will convert vice and misery into the instruments of improvement and felicity.

The good man while he looks abroad into society, behold wickedness triumphant. He hears the noise of the trumpet and the clangor of arms. He sees angry and guilty nations, rising in their might and rushing into violent and awful collision. He witnesses all the fury and horrors of vice, bursting forth like a torrent, overwhelming the abodes of domestic peace, the monuments of art, the cottage, the palace, and the temple, and burying in undistinguished ruin the supports of human grandeur, glory, and happiness.

For with a frown
Revenge impatient rose:
He threw his blood-stained sword in thunder down
And, with a withering look,
The war-denouncing trumpet took,
And blew a blast so loud and dread,
Were ne’er prophetic sounds so full of woe;
And ever and anon he beat
The doubling drum, with furious heat,
And though sometimes, each dreary pause between,
Dejected pity at his side,
Her soul subduing voice applied,
Yet still he kept his wile unaltered mien,
While such strained ball of sign seem’d bursting from his head. 13 [From a poem titled “The Passions” by William Collins (1721-1759).]

But let no the good man be dismayed He shall stand, like some mighty cliff which lifts its head above the sea; the angry waves may lash its base and tempest roll down its sides, but “an eternal sunshine settles on its head.” 14 He has nothing to fear; he beholds an almighty arm moving and directing the vast and complicated operations of universal nature; and when the final storm rushes on, when the earth shall burst asunder, when in the figurative and prophetic language of the apostle, the Heavens shall pass away with a great noise, the elements melt with fervent heat, 15 and the world is sinking beneath him, the hand of Providence shall seize him, and convey him to the realms of peace, of light, and of glory.

Let us cling therefore, my brethren, to this transporting doctrine. By lives of virtue and piety, for nothing else can effect it, let us assure ourselves in every condition of the protection and favor of that infinite and adorable Being with whom there is not the shadow of change, 16 at whose disposal are empires and worlds, 17 who inhabits eternity, 18 and who is over all, in all, and through all things, blessed forever. 19




Endnotes

1. Ps. xciv. 9. (Return)

2. Maclaurin, quoted by Price. Diss. p. 52. (Return)

3. Rom. xi. 36. Eph. iv. 6. (Return)

4. Habak. iii. 11. (Return)

5. Dan. iv. 35. (Return)

6. I Cor. iii. 19. (Return)

7. Works, fol. vol. iii. p. 509. (Return)

8. Ps. lxxvi. 10. (Return)

9. I. Cor. xv. 33. (Return)

10. 2 Cor. v. 10. (Return)

11. Isa. iii. 10. (Return)

12. Lam. iii. 40. (Return)

13. Collins. (Return)

14. At some tall cliff that lifts its awful form, & c. – Goldsmith. (Return)

15. 2 Pet. iii. 10. (Return)

16. Jas. i. 17. (Return)

17. Job xii. 23. (Return)

18. Isaiah lvii. 15. (Return)

19. Rom. ix. 5. (Return)

Should We Have Christian Companies?

By Hugh Whelchel

Some of the largest companies in the United States have been identified as “Christian,” and this occasionally makes news headlines. Last summer, Chick-fil-A took a controversial stand against gay marriage because of the beliefs of its Christian ownership. This summer, Hobby Lobby went to court because of its Christian convictions. And now, Forever 21 is under attack for cutting employee benefits, a move that some say is inconsistent with its Christian principles.
Some companies have been identified as “Christian” by outside sources because of the convictions of their management. Others have openly branded themselves in this way by identifying with certain causes, printing Bible verses on its products, closing on Sundays, or playing Christian music in stores. This can be a great way to witness as long as the words of these businesses are consistent with their deeds.
Is there more to being a “Christian” company? Is there, as Mark Oppenheimer and Paul Prather suggested in August, something less visible to the outside world but which shapes the corporate culture of businesses owned and operated by Christians?
What we need to be focusing on is not whether we have Christian businesses, but whether we have Christian businessmen who integrate their convictions and principles with their work.
After all, how do we define “Christian” for businesses? Does it mean that the management or ownership is Christian? Does it mean that all the employees sign a statement of faith? Does it mean that you only sell Christian products? Does it mean that your company plays Christian music or puts Bible verses on its packaging?
Ultimately, it’s important for Christians to remember why they are in business to begin with. We should concentrate on the most important part of owning and operating a company: making our businesses into good businesses. And the best business is a profitable business. It is profitable because it is effectively serving the needs of others.
My friend Steve Garber, founder of the Washington Institute for Faith, Vocation, and Culture, serves as a consultant for businessmen in several large corporations. He helps them to weave their Christian beliefs with the way they run their companies, asking,
Can we find our way to seeing the health of business as more complex than simply maximizing shareholder profit, to one that in fact addresses profit, people, and planet at the same time—and therefore a more sustainable profitability?
Steve understands that biblical principles can inform the way we do business, taking our focus away from self-centered, unethical, and short-term tactics for making a profit. If we apply our Christian beliefs to the way we do business, we will focus instead on sustainability, serving others, and, ultimately, long-term profitability.
Christians in business should strive to live their faith through work. This means:
  • Providing high-quality customer service.
  • Being honest and upstanding in every transaction.
  • Stewarding one’s resources effectively.
  • Producing high-quality goods and services.
  • Treating every single employee with dignity.
  • Seeking to serve others and create value.
Of course, these are things that every business owner should be doing. But since Christians live to serve God and uphold the principles set out by the Bible, we should be particularly intentional about running our businesses well.
Titus 3:8 emphasizes that Christ sacrificed himself for us so “that those who have trusted in God may be careful to devote themselves to doing what is good. These things are excellent and profitable for everyone.” Since Christ saved us and renewed us, he calls us to turn around and work toward the well-being and renewal of the rest of the world.
Business owners have a unique opportunity to impact society by serving their customers, creating jobs, and contributing to the overall well-being of their communities. They are furthering God’s kingdom here on earth.
Christians should seek primarily to create companies that cultivate an outstanding reputation, have a corporate culture that exemplifies biblical principles, and create genuine value for their customers. A Christian business owner could be doing this very well without running a specifically “Christian” business.
In his book, Redeeming Law, Michael P. Schutt speaks to this issue as he remembers his own experience as a young Christian lawyer trying to understand how to integrate his faith with his legal practice.
We wanted to be more than Christians muddling through the law. We wanted to be Christian lawyers, our faith integrated with our calling.
The same applies to the businessman. Rather than asking “Should my company be Christian?” it is more helpful to first ask, “How can I run my business in the most biblical manner? How can I make others ask, ‘What’s different about this business?’”
After all, anyone can label themselves. It’s the actions that demonstrate true courage, commitment, and conviction.

Friday, September 6, 2013

Christian Message in Arabic

Saturday, August 24th, 2013

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness
This is coming from a church called: Iglesia Camino de Salvación (Church of the Way of Salvation)
The leaders are: Pastors: Abraham Merhi y Sara Zakhour de Merhi
Those are Arab surnames. These are Arab-Latin Evangelicals.
From Caracas, Venezuela.
Their website is here: www.iglesiacaminosalvacion.com
For those of you who think the Islam would stand a chance in South America, what do you do with Arab-Latin Evangelicals?
A way to world peace is to pay the Palestinians in Judea and Samaria (what the world wrongly calls the West Bank) to move to South America. They would be Christianized in a short time.

Jesus in the Ship of your life
The Speaker is Sister Nawal Nhra (Rivers). Not a Catholic Sister, but an female officer in an Evangelical Church, probably married.
As I have shown on other posts, Evangelical Arab-Christian churches are common in Latin America.

Monday, September 2, 2013

The Social Gospel and the Progressive Era

Bradley W. Bateman
Provost and Professor of Economics
Denison University
©National Humanities Center


Washington Gladden
When Washington Gladden accepted the call to the pulpit of the Congregational Church in Springfield, Massachusetts in 1875, his parishioners had little reason to expect that their call to the thirty nine year old pastor might mark the beginning of a new epoch in American Protestantism. Gladden was a respected pastor who had held positions in New York City and North Adams, Massachusetts and had served as an editor of the New York Independent, but there was no reason to suspect that he would press the boundaries of American Protestantism beyond its well-understood boundaries. Within a year, however, Gladden would step across one of the most well respected boundaries for the Protestant ministry in America and advocate the rights of workers to form labor unions.

Throughout the nineteenth century, American Protestant ministers had been stalwart advocates of laissez-faire. Ministers such as Francis Wayland and John MacVickar wrote widely used collegiate textbooks in economics that praised the virtues of unimpeded capitalism and the rights of capitalists to the fruits of their labors. Their texts, however, were written before the Civil War and so they had written about a form of mercantile capitalism in which farmers and the owners of small shops constituted the majority of those who owned capital. When the Civil War began, less than half of Americans worked for someone else earning wages for their labor, and these were often young men who worked as farm laborers before starting their own farms. The economic world that evolved after the Civil War, however, was very different from what Americans had known in the antebellum period. As America industrialized, millions of Americans would flood into factories to earn wages.

Population of
city of Chicago
1840
5,000
1850
30,000
1870
300,000
1890
1,100,000

Thus, the vertical integration of American industry in the last three decades of the nineteenth century wrought monumental changes in the structure of both American industry and American culture. As giant corporations such as U.S. Steel and Standard Oil grew to dominate their industries, American cities began to grow rapidly, too. Chicago was a city of 5,000 in 1840 and 30,000 in 1850; by 1870 there were 300,000 in Chicago and in 1890 there were 1.1 million Chicagoans. This rapid population growth was achieved in part by pulling people out of rural areas, where 40% of American townships experienced shrinking population between 1880 and 1890. But the rapid growth of urban areas was also a result of large-scale immigration from southern and central Europe. All at one time, America was becoming more industrial, more urban, and more ethnically diverse.

Jacob Riis
The rapid growth of America’s cities and its urban population was matched by a rise in squalor and poverty that shocked many people. One of America’s first photojournalists, Jacob Riis, an immigrant from Denmark, made his name by publishing photographs of the living conditions of the urban poor. Riis would become especially well-known for a book entitled How the Other Half Lives (1890), which included some of his most abject photographs.

When Washington Gladden took his pulpit in Springfield, Massachusetts in 1875, he found himself unexpectedly thrust into this rapidly changing world of industrial America. During his first year in Springfield, there was a strike of workers in the shoe factories. When Gladden went to visit with the strikers, he found himself sympathetic with their plight. When he invited them to attend his church, however, they told him that this was not likely since the people who owned and managed the factories they were striking attended his church. Gladden was undeterred and the next year put his journalistic skills to work and published a book that supported the right of workers to organize unions, Working People and their Employers (1876).

Gladden’s book brought him fame and notoriety and would come to be seen by many as the beginning of a new era in American Christianity. The story of the Social Gospel movement is much more complex, however, than one man or one book. Nor were industrialism and the problems that it wrought the only concern of those who formed the Social Gospel movement.

During the early decades of the nineteenth century when the Second Great Awakening swept the nation, social reform had become an important dimension of American Protestantism. Whereas the First Great Awakening had focused largely on redeeming the souls of individual sinners, the Second Great Awakening had focused on both the souls of individuals and on social problems such as drinking, prostitution, and slavery. The revivals of the Second Great Awakening became a seedbed for social reform and helped to spawn both the temperance movement and the abolition movement. This focus on social problems in the antebellum world undoubtedly influenced the sense of purpose in post-Civil War ministers, such as Gladden, who wanted Protestant churches to address the problems they saw emerging from the rapidly changing capitalism of the late nineteenth century.

One of the institutional structures that emerged from the Second Great Awakening, the home mission societies, was also responsible for helping to shape the Social Gospel movement. In the antebellum world, home mission societies were interdenominational, Protestant organizations that sent people onto the western frontier and into the south to try to start new churches and to address pressing social problems. For instance, the American Home Mission Society, a joint operation of the Congregational and Presbyterian churches sent young missionaries into the new western territories before the Civil War to establish churches and to push for temperance and abolition. After the Civil War, when Reconstruction failed to secure the rights of the freedmen, many of the same people who had worked earlier for the abolition of slavery became passionate advocates for the rights of the freedmen. Although Washington Gladden had not been involved in home mission work, he would eventually become an advocate of the rights of African Americans and would help to form the N.A.A.C.P. Thus, although the Social Gospel movement will always be identified with the response to the rapidly emerging industrialism of the late nineteenth century, it is also the case that many advocates of the Social Gospel were also concerned with race relations and the rights of African-Americans.

Neither of these concerns made it easy to preach the Social Gospel in the late nineteenth century. The collapse of Reconstruction did not lead to a large national outrage; in fact, Reconstruction failed because white Americans found themselves unwilling or unable to deal with the new social and cultural landscape created by the end of slavery. The few voices brave enough to rail against lynching from the pulpits of white Protestant churches during the last two decades of the century raised no great social reaction against the violation of the rights of African Americans. Likewise, the political response to the plight of working Americans who had no disability insurance, no rights to unionize, and no work place protection was limited. Although William Jennings Bryan did not identify with the leaders of the Social Gospel movement, he did campaign during both of his bids for the presidency in the 1890s on a call to improve the lives of working Americans. He lost both his races in what is, in retrospect, a conservative time.

Walter Rauschenbusch
The great theologian of the Social Gospel, Walter Rauschenbusch, would later refer to the 1890s as a “dark time” for those who advocated the Social Gospel. The times undoubtedly seemed dark because those who preached seemed not to be reaching many of the people who sat in the pews. Following the Civil War, American Protestantism began to split into what Martin Marty has termed “Two party Protestantism”, composed of a “private party” and a public party.” Each of these parties drew from the force and energy of the Second Great Awakening. The private party focused on saving individual souls; in revivals in the rapidly expanding cities, they attempted to get people to turn away from their own sins and to embrace personal salvation. The public party focused on the sins of society, such as poverty and inequality, and asked people to seek salvation through building “the Kingdom of God on this earth.” Through the 1880s and 1890s, the private party raced ahead of the public party in popularity and public appeal.

Each of the groups was evangelical, meaning that they drew their message from the Bible, and each of them focused on redemption. But their objects of concern were very different. So were their sources of inspiration. In many ways, the private party harked back to the traditional themes of the First Great Awakening. Although the First Great Awakening has been driven in part by concern for how a Christian polity could be sustained if succeeding generations did not embrace their parents’ beliefs, the solution hinged solely on securing the salvation of the individuals who made up that polity. If people could be made to understand their own sinfulness and repent, their salvation would guarantee their membership in the Christian polity. Like these eighteenth century Protestants, the advocates of the private party saw their work as focused on the redemption of individual souls.

The partisans of public party, however, built on the reform elements of the Second Great Awakening, while also drawing from other new nineteenth century ideas, to build a new understanding of society and the church. In particular, they were influenced by the Higher Criticism from Germany and Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859).

In the mid-nineteenth century, there was still no graduate education in the United States, so most serious scholars went to Germany if they wanted to pursue post-baccalaureate work. Many of the young men who traveled to Germany discovered the Higher Criticism while there, a method of Biblical interpretation that argued against seeing the Bible as literally true. Scholars of the Higher Criticism believed that the stories in the Bible might contain insights into the nature of the Christian God, but they believed that understanding that nature would require careful explanation of the Bible’s complicated narratives. In this view, there was no easy literal truth to be found in reading the Bible. Coupled with Darwin’s ideas, the Higher Criticism opened up a new and unfamiliar self-understanding for Protestants who were already shocked by the changes in the rural, agrarian society they had known before the Civil War.

For those who embraced both the Higher Criticism and Darwin’s work, there seemed to be the possibility to build a new world that ameliorated the dislocations of the new industrial capitalism. Darwin’s work, however, had also been embraced by some late nineteenth century American academics such as William Graham Sumner, as an explanation and justification for the outcomes of the new industrialism. When these conservative academics looked at the widespread poverty and the high levels of disease and infant mortality, they saw the work of natural selection. This so-called Social Darwinism offered an argument that allowed some people to see the dislocations of industrialism as the necessary weeding out of the weak and unfit as society evolved toward a new and higher form of social organization.

The advocates of the Social Gospel, however, saw things in a very different light. Instead of seeing the dislocations caused by industrialism as inevitable or desirable, the Social Gospelers saw them as the result of greed and the collective failure to protect people. Social Gospel leaders such as George Herron saw the terrible living conditions of workers and their families in urban areas as evidence of the beginning of a new millennium in which Christians were called to build the Kingdom of God. Not to make an effort to build this Kingdom in the face of such human suffering would be a social sin in the eyes of the Social Gospelers.

Thus, despite the fact that the people in the pews were not often driven during the last decades of the nineteenth century to act on the new message of the Social Gospel, the theologians of the Social Gospel were compelled to continue preaching their unpopular message. On the one hand, they were driven by the association of their ideas with the most current trends in higher education to believe that they were correct in what they believed; on the other hand, they were driven by their evangelical fervor to try to help those in need.

It was not until the first decade of the twentieth century that the Social Gospel message began to have widespread appeal to the people in the pews. One reason for the shift in public opinion was that the dislocations created by industrialism were not going away on their own. It also helped that as poverty, inequality, and industrial injuries all continued to grow, muckraking journalists began to report on these grim realities. Jacob Riis’s photographs and writing were only the beginning of America’s exposure to the realities of industrialism. Like Riis, many of the leading muckrakers were followers of the Social Gospel who were driven by their faith to try to show Americans the problems of the new industrial order. Just as Protestant revivalists had believed since the eighteenth century that if people were faced with their sins they might repent and seek salvation, the Social Gospelers believed that if American society were shown the sins of industrialism, they would repent and build a more just social order. If the Social Gospel preachers had not been able to do this on their own in the 1880s and 1890s, the muckrakers were eventually able to help stir people to understand a new set of responsibilities that befell them as followers of Jesus Christ.

The confluence of Social Gospel preaching and muckraking journalism helped to form the popular support that underpinned the early Progressive movement. Early reform politicians like Theodore Roosevelt depended on socially aware Christians for much of their support.

The real strength of this support became obvious within the churches in 1907 and 1908 when The Social Creed of the Churches was adopted by virtually all the mainline Protestant churches. Passed first by the Methodists in 1907, the Social Creed called for many measures to alleviate the conditions created by the new industrial workplace, for instance, the alleviation of Sunday working hours, the elimination of child labor, and the creation of disability insurance for workers injured in factories. The next year, the National Council of Churches was founded as a part of the effort to get the other Protestant churches to accept the Social Creed. Walter Rauschenbusch also published his Social Gospel classic Christianity and the Social Crisis in 1907 and this had a profound impact on Protestants of all stripes. Whereas nineteenth century Protestants had largely turned their backs on social problems caused by economic development, they now embraced the call to address them. For theologians like Rauschenbusch, this felt like a new moment in human history and the beginning of a new American awakening. Recently, the economic historian and Nobel Prize winner Robert Fogel has called this moment in American history the Third Great Awakening.

The Social Gospel’s role in the Progressive Era was amplified by the close connection between the Social Gospel and the emergence of professional social science in the late nineteenth century. During the last three decades of the nineteenth century, economics, political science, and sociology all emerged in American universities as the result of the influence of the Social Gospel. The leaders in all three disciplines were “social Christians” who saw their work as central to showing the truth about American society and the need for reform. This often lead them to grief as there were no guarantees of tenure and academic freedom in the nineteenth century and many academic careers were ruined by trustees and college presidents who dismissed advocates of the Social Gospel from their faculties; but with the emergence of the Progressive movement in the first decade of the twentieth century, many squelched careers and silence voices were resurrected and social scientists became central in the political work of the Progressives.

This influence was perhaps most obvious in the social survey movement. The social survey had emerged as a method of social investigation during the end of the nineteenth century. Pioneered in England, Americans began to use the social survey extensively in the 1890s. Social surveyors would canvas urban neighborhoods and build careful maps of each building and what happened there. Typically, there would be a set of maps of the same neighborhoods, each one built to show different characteristics of the neighborhood. One map would show the nationalities of the occupants of each residence, color-coded to show the diversity and origin of the people in the neighborhood. Another map would show places of employment and another would show the location of churches, saloons, and brothels. The maps were meant to show several things, not least the places where there were no Protestant churches and the places where they were most needed. Both Jane Addams, one of the founders of Hull House, and W.E.B. DuBois, the great black social activist, were active in social surveying in the 1890s.

But the social survey had its greatest moment in the first two decades of the twentieth century. Economists such as Richard T. Ely and John R. Commons were active in the movement, as were interdenominational leaders such as Josiah Strong. In these two decades, the social survey became an important tool of Protestant revivals; large-scale social surveys would be undertaken in the months before a revival so that the information collected could be used during a revival to challenge people to work through their churches to try to ameliorate the bad social conditions in their neighborhood. One of the leading magazines of the Progressives was The Survey, a monthly magazine that combined Christian themes and practical advice on conducting social surveys.

One of the best examples of the melding of the social survey and Protestant revivalism occurred in 1910 and 1911 with the Men and Religion Forward Movement. At the time, the Movement was the largest evangelism effort in American history, covering revivals in 88 cities over several months. A central committee organized the work of the social survey in each city before the revival took place and a separate publicity committee spread the results of the social survey in the weeks before the evangelists were brought in to run the revival. The organizers were interested in trying to increase male church attendance and they saw this method as the best way to get men interested in the church as a way of improving their communities. The Movement was considered a major success and reshaped the landscape of revivalism.

President Woodrow Wilson
The heyday of the Protestant influence in the Progressive Era was in the first half of the second decade of the twentieth century. Progressive social Christians were especially important in the national elections of 1912 and 1916. Woodrow Wilson had studied under the Social Gospel leader (and economist) Richard T. Ely at Johns Hopkins in the 1880s, and he represented the sensibility of the mainstream Protestant churches in his approach to reform. In 1917, Wilson arranged to send one of the most radical Social Gospel firebrands of the 1890s as his personal emissary to Lenin after the Russian revolution. George Herron had preached a nascent form of Christian socialism in the 1890s before seeking exile in Italy in the first decade of the new century. As a former socialist firebrand and supporter of Eugene Debs’ presidential candidacy in 1904, Herron seemed the perfect ambassador to Lenin.

By the middle of the second decade of the twentieth century, the Progressive movement had begun to become more diverse in its sources and participants. In turn, this change led to new self understanding(s) among Progressives. On the one hand, by the second decade of the century some people had started to become skeptical of the possibility for any kind of fundamental change in human nature. While they were still disturbed by the kinds of social dislocation wrought by industrialism, they were less likely to see the possibility for their amelioration through any fundamental shift in human nature. The ethical improvement that the Social Gospelers preached as a necessary part of social reform was not obviously taking place on any large scale.

On the other hand, not all Progressives were Christians by the second decade of the century. Two of the leading progressive writers to emerge after 1910, for instance, were Jewish: Herbert Croly and Walter Lippman. Both Croly and Lippman offered a vision of political transformation that was much more clearly based on technical expertise and the possibility to gain mastery over social problems through the application of tough critical analysis to social problems. This led to the early popularity of Frederick Taylor’s time and motion studies, which were seen as a means to make the industrial system more efficient and so to provide a larger output that could be used to take care of more people. After 1918, many Christian social scientists such as John R. Commons purposely secularized their own rhetoric to make it more amenable to non-Christians and more in line with the new movement to secular expertise as the basis for social control.

But for better or for worse, the Social Gospel itself had become so widely popular by the time of America’s entry into the First World War, that its message began to be adulterated by Protestant ministers more interested in the idea of America as the Kingdom of God than they were in helping working people attain a better, more secure life. These more conservative preachers saw the potential of the Social Gospel as a tool of nationalism, rather than as a tool of reform. These men, drawing on President Wilson argument for the need to enter the First World War in order to make the world safe for democracy, often used their pulpits to advocate the war. Ray Abrams (1933) has documented the violent calls by many of these nationalistic advocates of the Social Gospel for young men to join in the trench warfare in Europe and defeat the Germans.

After the war, when the American public learned of the horrific nature of the trench warfare and realized what the young men had been called to do, the Protestant ministers who had used their pulpits to aid in enlisting young men to fight in the war lost their credibility. This loss of credibility was a part of larger public disillusionment with the ideas that had underpinned the Progressive Movement. Although there had already been some disillusionment before the war with the Social Gospel ideas of an improvement in human nature, this disillusionment became an abandonment of hope after the war. Even Progressives like Lippman who had tried to develop a more technical rationale for improving industrial society now found it difficult to gain a serious audience. Even the assumption that people might be so broadly motivated so as to want to more equitably distribute an increased industrial output came to be seen as naïve, if not quaint.

The end of the First World War is often seen as the end of the Progressive Era, and it was the end of the Social Gospel’s widespread appeal to the people in the pews of America’s Protestant churches. The loss of hope in the possibility of easily building a better world through an appeal to people’s outrage at social inequality and inequity marked the end of an epoch in American politics and in America’s Protestant churches.

The influence of the Social Gospel in American life was not finished, however. As Conrad Cherry (1995) has shown, when the Social Gospel fell out of favor in the pulpits of mainline churches, its influence continued in Protestant divinity schools. It remained a vital force there well into the second half of the twentieth century. When the young Martin Luther King, Jr. arrived at Boston University in the 1950s to study theology, he found the Social Gospel tradition alive and well. He then used the theology of the Social Gospel to build the foundations of his own arguments for the civil rights of blacks. King was assassinated at the time that he was beginning to turn his focus to questions of economic justice, but like his predecessors in the late nineteenth century, he too combined a theological passion for the freedom of America’s blacks and for the equitable treatment of America’s workers.



Bradley W. Bateman is Provost and Executive Vice President at Denison University. He began his teaching career at Simmons College and then spent 20 years on the faculty at Grinnell College. His fields of interest are the history of economic thought, monetary/macroeconomics, and natural resource economics. Bateman has an international reputation as a student of the economic thought of John Maynard Keynes and is author of Keynes’s Uncertain Revolution and co-editor of Cambridge Companion to Keynes (with Roger E. Backhouse) and Keynes and Philosophy: Essays on the Origin of Keynes’s Thought (with J.B. Davis). He became the Provost of Denison University in 2007.

 


AULA partners with Montana Family Foundation say parental involvement laws protect teens

By admin on August 29, 2013 10:15 AM

WASHINGTON, D.C. (08-28-13) --
AULA and Montana Family Foundation filed an amicus curiae brief this week in the First Judicial District Court supporting Montana's parental consent and parental notice laws against a challenge by Planned Parenthood. "Children victimized by sexual predators or vulnerable to pressure from an abortion sales team need adult involvement when making such a life-changing decision," said Americans United for Life Action President and CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest.
She continued:
Abortion harms women, and medical evidence demonstrates that young girls are particularly susceptible to those risks. Yet Planned Parenthood continues its attempts to block commonsense regulations aimed at protecting the health and welfare of young girls and the rights of their parents.
Medical research indicates that minors who abort have an astonishing 78.6 percent chance of experiencing major depression afterward.

Not only would Montana's laws ensure that parents are given the opportunity to help their daughters receive all the information they need to make the best decision, but it also ensures that parents of a daughter who chooses abortion will know about the risk they face.
In 2011, the citizens of Montana passed Legislative Referendum 120, the Parental Notice of Abortion Act of 2011, requiring parental notice before abortion. The initiative was overwhelmingly supported with over 70 percent of the vote. Then in 2013, the Montana Legislature enacted House Bill 391, the Parental Consent for Abortion Act of 2013, requiring parental consent before abortion. Planned Parenthood is challenging both laws.
AULA's amicus brief in Planned Parenthood of Montana v. State of Montana, available here, demonstrates that parental consent and notice laws decrease both minor abortion rates and minor birth rates, that abortion carries significant physical and psychological risks, and that minors are particularly susceptible to these risks.
AULA attorneys have been actively involved in the fight to protect minors and parental rights in Montana. The challenged laws are based on AULA model language, and AUL consulted with allies in Montana during consideration and passage of the laws.

Why God Designed Us to Live in Community

September 1, 2013|12:41 pm
Life in this fallen world is hard. Preparation is hard. Change is hard. It's easy to get discouraged. It's easy to feel overwhelmed. It's easy to remain or revert to being self-absorbed. It's easy to feel alone. It's easy to think that no one understands what you are going through.
It's tempting to think like Moses that God must have gotten the wrong address, that this trial couldn't have been intended for your doorstep. It's easy to give in to wondering if the hardships of the Christian life are worth the trouble. It's easy to look over the fence and yield to debilitating envy. It's easy to let go of good and godly personal spiritual habits. It's easy, at the end of a long day, to try to numb or distract yourself by whatever temporary pleasure lies within reach.
It's easy to deceive yourself about the need to change, to grow in godliness. It's easy to lose your way and give up. But it's important for you to remember that life and ministry in the fallen world are hard, not only for you, but also for everyone in your care.
That's why God has designed us to live with others in a community of love. When I read 1 Peter 1, I'm always struck by how God has placed a call to love at the end of a discussion of hardship. As Peter summarizes what God is doing here and now, he uses three words: "suffer, grief, and trial." None of us wants these things! But Peter reminds us that they're tools of refinement in the hands of a loving Redeemer intent on completing in us what he's begun. Then Peter begins to lay out how to live productively in the middle of these hardships.
Listen to his final directive: "Now that you have purified yourselves by obeying the truth so that you have sincere love for your brothers, love one another deeply, from the heart" (1 Peter 1:22). Peter is saying something very powerful here. God hasn't simply called us to endure the refining fires of sanctification. He's ordained us to incarnate his love through the community he's placed around us. This community of love gives us hope and strength. But it also encourages us with the reminder that the One who tests and trains is the One who loves.
This community of love is meant to comfort the person who's discouraged, to strengthen the person who's weak, to encourage the person who has no hope, to come alongside the person who's alone, to guide the person who's lost his way, to give wisdom to the person lost in foolishness, to warn the person who's beginning to wander, to correct the person turning the wrong way, to give eyes to the person blind to God's presence, and to physically represent God's presence and love. No one, including pastors, is wired to live outside this community.
So as you're living and ministering in this broken world, what does God call you to do? There's one sure and reliable answer to the question: he calls you to seize every opportunity to be an instrument of his love.
An an ambassador of Christ, you've been called to participate in a community of love that is the church:
  • That teenager attracted to the world needs God's love.
  • That single person facing the death of personal dreams needs God's love
  • That immigrant brother or sister who feels so out of place and so misunderstood needs God's love.
  • That mom overwhelmed with her parenting responsibilities needs God's love.
  • That man tempted to walk out of his troubled marriage needs God's love.
  • That little boy who lost his father to divorce needs God's love.
  • That woman living through the ravages of cancer needs God's love.
  • That couple facing debts they can't pay needs God's love.
  • The woman who now faces life without the man who's been her companion for decades needs God's love.
  • That pastor carrying a heavy weight of spiritual responsibility needs God's love.
  • That university student facing spiritual warfare needs God's love.
We could multiply example after example. There is no location, situation, or relationship this side of heaven where this love is extraneous. This love isn't about liking people. It isn't about romantic affection. It's something more than cultural niceness. It's deeper than being respectful or mannerly.
This love finds its motivation, hope, and direction at the cross of Jesus Christ. It's active, persevering, tender, understanding, forgiving, compassionate, and self-sacrificing love. The people in your care need this cross-shaped love, and so do you. You can love others because the One you represent never fails to love you perfectly this way in both your best and worst moments.
Paul David Tripp is a pastor, author, and international conference speaker. He is the president of Paul Tripp Ministries and works to connect the transforming power of Jesus Christ to everyday life.